Bodyguard builds a machine-learning model on OVHcloud AutoML to detect hateful comments, reaching 90% detection with a 3% false-positive rate
Bodyguard, an anti-cyber-bullying app, built its predictive model and a meta-learning model with OVHcloud AutoML and scikit-learn, running on OVHcloud Public Cloud instances. The source states detection accuracy rose from 80% to 90%, false positives fell from 6% to 3%, and more than 2 million hateful comments were deleted in 20 months.
Overview
Bodyguard, an anti-cyber-bullying app, built its predictive model and a meta-learning model with OVHcloud AutoML and scikit-learn, running on OVHcloud Public Cloud instances. The source states detection accuracy rose from 80% to 90%, false positives fell from 6% to 3%, and more than 2 million hateful comments were deleted in 20 months.
This entry has 10 published fields tied to exact passages in an immutable source capture.
Inspect the highlighted sourceThe challenge
Bodyguard's technology needed to analyse the context of a comment and who it is aimed at, understand states of mind, and detect irony, sarcasm and humour, in order to reduce false positives and increase accuracy, with an error rate that could not exceed 10%.
The solution
Bodyguard used OVHcloud AutoML, a distributed and scalable machine learning platform, together with open-source scikit-learn algorithms to build a predictive model and a meta-learning model that analyses the relationship between the author of the content and the commenter. The infrastructure runs on three OVHcloud Public Cloud instances.
Reported business value
According to the source, detection accuracy rose from 80% to 90% and false positives fell from 6% to 3%. The app deleted more than 2 million hateful comments in 20 months and had more than 40,000 users in July 2019. These figures are the company's own claims.
Sources
Open any source and check the claim yourself — that is the point of the register.
This record was researched and written with AI assistance, and its claims were checked against the sources above. (EU AI Act art. 50 transparency notice.)
Other technology & software entries in the register.
HP crafts marketing campaigns that resonate with customers using Databricks and Uniphore
HP centralized first-party customer data on the Databricks Data + AI Platform with Delta Lake and Unity Catalog, and connected it to Uniphore's HybridCompute for federated query pushdown, cutting campaign setup from 2 weeks to 2 hours and processing 400 million records in seconds.
Building a safer and more sustainable world
Novade, a construction management software company, partnered with Databricks to modernize its analytics and ML infrastructure, moving from a homegrown Apache Airflow stack to the Databricks Data + AI Platform with Delta Lake, Unity Catalog and MLflow. The move reduced total cost of ownership by 60% and supported a 100% increase in new clients, while enabling ML models for predicting incident risk affecting worker safety and project delivery schedules.
SafeGraph optimizes geospatial data processing with Databricks and Delta Sharing
SafeGraph used the Databricks Data + AI Platform, Delta Lake, Delta Sharing and MLflow to process petabytes of geospatial data and feed predictive models, achieving 2x-10x faster spatial querying, indexing and partitioning and a 50% reduction in peak memory consumption compared to other platforms, while reducing data access time for partners from months to minutes via Delta Sharing.
Transforming Weather Forecasting with Lakeflow Jobs
AccuWeather migrated from on-premises infrastructure to Databricks and Lakeflow Jobs, working with Datadog for observability, to unify diverse weather data formats and orchestrate 4,500+ weekly jobs. Lakeflow Jobs coordinates the ingestion of multiple weather models, triggers machine learning processes that weight and blend different forecasts, and manages complex job dependencies for reinforcement training workflows used in AccuWeather's proprietary forecasting engine. AccuWeather reports 3x faster dataset development (three months to one month per dataset), a 50% reduction in unactionable alerts, and 50% cost savings on serverless job usage.
Was this helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve our use case database
